Ab ovo or in medias res? Rewriting History for the Early Modern Stage Or, How Elizabethan History Plays Collapsed Referentiality
Abstract
Shakespeare’s representations of history often have replaced history itself in the popular imagination: Julius Caesar, Margaret of Anjou, Henry V, Richard III — popular recollections of their lives and deaths are intimately linked with Shakespeare’s account of their stories, despite the playwright’s deviations from historical fact. In order to “make” history through the power of words, as suggested by the Prologue of Henry V, Elizabethan history plays continuously altered history, deviating both from historical facts and classical rules of dramatic writing. This contribution will discuss the several referential crises created and embodied by Elizabethan history plays, showing how the flaunting of mimetic rules inherited from Aristotle, and from the rules of historiographic writing, allowed Shakespeare and his contemporaries to rival and challenge God’s Creation — much to the dismay of Puritan antitheatricalists. Elizabethan history plays made and unmade history, providing competing accounts of the past, using anachronism to express their nostalgia for a past which, despite its ability to relive on stage, remains but an “airy nothing”.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Work submitted for publication must be original, previously unpublished, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere. If previously published figures, tables, or parts of text are to be included, the copyright-holder's permission must have been obtained prior to submission.
- Authors of accepted manuscripts will assign to L'Atelier the right to electronically distribute their article, or publish it in any form (Internet, CD ROM, printed copy) but authors will retain copyright and, after the article has appeared in L'Atelier, authors may republish their text (in print and/or electronic form) as long as they clearly acknowledge L'Atelier as the original publisher.