Ab ovo or in medias res? Rewriting History for the Early Modern Stage Or, How Elizabethan History Plays Collapsed Referentiality

Authors

  • Yan Brailowsky Université Paris Nanterre

Abstract

Shakespeare’s representations of history often have replaced history itself in the popular imagination: Julius Caesar, Margaret of Anjou, Henry V, Richard III — popular recollections of their lives and deaths are intimately linked with Shakespeare’s account of their stories, despite the playwright’s deviations from historical fact. In order to “make” history through the power of words, as suggested by the Prologue of Henry V, Elizabethan history plays continuously altered history, deviating both from historical facts and classical rules of dramatic writing. This contribution will discuss the several referential crises created and embodied by Elizabethan history plays, showing how the flaunting of mimetic rules inherited from Aristotle, and from the rules of historiographic writing, allowed Shakespeare and his contemporaries to rival and challenge God’s Creation — much to the dismay of Puritan antitheatricalists. Elizabethan history plays made and unmade history, providing competing accounts of the past, using anachronism to express their nostalgia for a past which, despite its ability to relive on stage, remains but an “airy nothing”.

Author Biography

Yan Brailowsky, Université Paris Nanterre

Yan Brailowsky is Senior lecturer in early modern literature and history at the University of Paris Nanterre (France). His research interests include prophecy in early modern drama, the history of the reformation, and the relationship between gender and politics in Renaissance Europe. He is the author of several book-length studies, and has co-edited several collections on early modern literature.

Published

2020-01-31